What the weta? This Power Ranger cricket can take on three different forms.

When most animals grow up, they pretty much look the same. Like, can you tell the difference between these two squirrels?

I mean, besides the fact that the one on the right might have a mild obesity problem, I couldn’t tell you who was who, even though I know they’re two different individuals that I observed on two different hiking trips.

Some animals, however, like to break this mould: enter, the Wellington tree weta.

34038703861_464b124c5f_z

It’s hard to believe, but both the individuals in that photo are mature adult males of the same species Hemideina crassidens: the one on the left just weighs about twice as much. Informally known as the Wellington tree weta, this is a giant species of cricket that hails from New Zealand and has many other equally juicy-looking relatives. This phenomenon in which a species can exhibit more than one final form/appearance is called polymorphism and is abundant in nature. Colour polymorphisms are probably the best-known type of polymorphism, such as the light and dark morphs of jaguar:

melanism_in_panthera_onca

This looks like such an evil twin situation ’bout to go down

The polymorphism in Wellington tree weta is not quite as striking as that of our sumptuous jaguar friends, being a size polymorphism: individuals grow up to achieve distinctly different final body sizes. The polymorphism of the Wellington tree weta is unusual for a couple of reasons: 1) only males have multiple forms (females are all roughly the same size), and 2) there are three different potential forms. Both of these facts beg the question: but why?

IMG_3844

A beautiful selection of personalized salads for the captive-held weta we have in the lab.

Enter a second character who will try to answer these questions: the grad student. This is how I spend most of my days, trying to sort out the mysteries of diversity that Mother Nature puts forth. I mean, that actually makes my job sound pretty damn impressive. In reality, I spend most of my time making tiny salads for the weta that we have in our lab. But when I’m not doing that, I’m trying to figure out how evolutionary theory could explain those two key observations. Largely because I’m just curious, but also because polymorphisms represent a form of biodiversity that we would like to conserve, and in order to manage and conserve it we first need to understand how it works.

Why do only the males get to have different outfits?

My research group is pretty sure we’ve figured this one out – in fact, when animals display size polymorphism, it’s often only expressed in males. We think this happens because of how intensely males compete amongst themselves to acquire matings to females. That might seem unrelated, but follow me here: females have to invest time in gestating and laying eggs, making them more interested in producing a smaller amount of high quality offspring. In the meantime, males have no incentive to be picky and benefit the most from just mating a lot and producing the most offspring possible. As a result, males compete intensely amongst themselves to mate with a limited number of females. This generates pressure to develop alternative strategies for acquiring matings: basically, when the marketplace is this competitive, you’ve gotta start getting creative. Smaller male morphs are probably optimized to employ different strategies to get with the ladies compared to larger male morphs: for example, small males may be “sneakers.” Yup, there’s a word you never wanted to hear associated with sex.

Screen Shot 2016-12-13 at 3.38.22 PM

Depiction of the heads of the three male morphs of the Wellington tree weta (from Kelly & Adams, 2010). Yes they ended up looking like they have v. expressive eyebrows.

“Sneaking” unfortunately means exactly what you think it does: small males, with their inconspicuous bodies and high manoeuvrability, dash in and mate quickly with females that are being guarded by larger males while the alpha’s back is turned. Animals are devious, right?! And this is not just a weird weta thing: it’s been documented in several species of fish and birds as well as other insects. So this gives us an idea of why only males exhibit alternative forms, although we haven’t yet confirmed that the smaller males use these ethically dubious strategies.

Salt, pepper, and…cumin?

Bringing us to the second question: why are there three different morphs? It’s common enough to see two alternative strategies: a dominant “guarding” type and a smaller “sneaker” type. So what is the middle-sized guy doing? Does he think that by being as bland and inoffensive as possible, he can sail through the dating world on a wave of average-ness?

boring BF weta

The truth is that this remains a bit of a mystery to us. One theory is that when competition is especially strong for females, there is “room” for a further third strategy: the marketplace demands even more creativity in order to get an edge on the competition. The problem is, we’re just not sure what that third strategy is. Maybe it involves a mix of the two other strategies: Mr. Average might actually be a jack of all trades who guards females when he can, and when it’s not worth it to fight a male larger than himself, attempts to sneak instead. Fingers crossed, I will get closer to the answer by the end of my Master’s degree!

Want to learn more about the lives of these bizarre insects? Check out the NZ Department of Conservation’s page. Or just want to see more gruesome photos? National Geographic has a photo tag where you can explore amazing weta photography.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s